This kept the MX in production while the was discontinued. Out of nowhere they entered the market, in our case the graphics card arena, and took up a big part of that arena. Retrieved April 12, All in all a very nice package for a rather low-cost graphics card. ATi, nVidia’s chief competitor, has stolen the performance crown in no uncertain terms with its excellent R card. This page was last edited on 10 October , at In consequence, Nvidia rolled out a slightly cheaper model:
|Date Added:||26 March 2016|
|File Size:||58.39 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Albatron Medusa GeForce4 Ti SE – Introduction – Medusa GeForce 4 Ti SE
I’ve said it before and will do it again. CS1 German-language sources de Use mdy dates from October Pages using deprecated image syntax All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from August Articles with unsourced statements from November Commons category link is on Wikidata.
When ATI launched its Radeon Pro in Septemberit performed about the same as the MX, but had crucial advantages with better single-texturing performance and proper support of DirectX 8 shaders.
Retrieved January 2, Optional there will be a video in version available also. Using third party drivers can, among other things, invalidate warranties. Although the was initially supposed to be part of the launch of the GeForce4 line, Nvidia had delayed its release to sell off the soon-to-be discontinued GeForce 3 chips.
Between capability and competenceTech Report, April 29, There were 3 initial models: To counteract these measures, chipset geforcr4 video card designers often opt to simply spruce up existing products with, say, a new name, new packaging, and perhaps the addition of a couple of minor features.
Next to all this the card simply just is a beauty to look at isn’t it?
In practice its main competitors were chipset-integrated graphics solutions, such as Intel’s G and Nvidia’s own nForce 2, but its main advantage over those was multiple-monitor support; Intel’s solutions did not have this at all, and the nForce 2’s multi-monitor support was much inferior to what the MX series offered.
Albatron is a company that consistently proceeds to surprise me.
To date there has not been one product we tested from Albatron that made us think it was a questionable buy. Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units. We see a new trend in the industry, product differentiationset yourself on another spot in the market to get more reputation and expand your diversity.
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
A GeForce with passive cooling It was very similar to its predecessor; the main differences were higher core and memory clock rates, a revised memory controller known as Lightspeed Memory Architecture IIupdated pixel shaders with new instructions for Direct3D 8. Many criticized the GeForce 4 MX name as a misleading marketing ploy since it was less advanced than the preceding GeForce 3.
One step forward, two steps back? S graphics card giant, is choosing to ‘update’ its present line of GeForce Ti-based cards before the imminent launch of its next-generation GeForce FX video card some time this spring.
As always Albatron handles their graphics cards with the same deal of respect as they do with their other products like mainboards. This page was last edited on 10 Octoberat From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti SE Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database
Being an affordable mainboard costs can be cut a little. Despite harsh criticism by gaming enthusiasts, the GeForce4 MX was a market success. Retrieved from ” https: In consequence, Nvidia rolled out a slightly cheaper model: You’ll also fine a SVideo to composite, composite and a SVideo cable in the box.